Alexander Zaitsev, director of the Research Institute of Radiology, Gomel, Belarus

„It’s about trust”

Alexander Zaitsev is the director of the Research Institute of Radiology in Gomel, which reports to the Ministry of Emergency. The institute logo is of a flower whose petals are meant to resemble the atom symbol. It employs 75 people at its headquarters and three branches.

"When we talk about agriculture in the radioactive-contaminated areas, I have to say from the outset that above a certain level of exposure, the land can't be cultivated any more. In Belarus this is 15 curies per square kilometre. For values between 1 and 15 curies, the soil is considered contaminated but cultivation is still possible under certain conditions. There are no restrictions under 1 curie. So we're talking here about soils that are lightly to moderately contaminated, and we're talking about the radionuclides caesium137 and strontium90, which are causing us the most trouble. Chemically, they are nearly identical to potassium, which plays an important role in the human body. When we absorb caesium137 and strontium90, our bodies perceive them as potassium. This applies to all living things, even plants. Every plant needs potassium, and it's an important fertiliser. For agriculture, this means that if we succeed in ensuring optimal potassium fertilisation, it would minimise the amount of radionuclides that the plants absorb. Unfortunately it's not that simple as fertilisation also depends on the nature of the soil and of course the plant itself. We solve this problem with geochemical passports; that is, we know for each type of soil its exact characteristics. This also holds true for exposure to radionuclides. With these geochemical passports, the kolkhozes (collective farms) already have an important decision-making tool, not only for fertilisation but for crop production, too. A majority of farms in Belarus are state-owned kolkhozes. Cultivating such soils requires expertise, which we provide through courses and seminars. Generally speaking, what we are dealing with in the south of Berlus are good to very good soils that are exposed to very different levels of radioactivity and also react very different to this exposure. Peat soils are particularly problematic, though they are relatively rare here. With radioactive contamination, it's only possible to use the soil to a very limited degree. This is especially true for growing vegetables. We generally dissuade people from growing protein-rich pulses such as beans or peas, but corn for animal feed is well suited – and it's needed, thanks to a rise in livestock farming. Radioactive contamination can be reduced with the appropriate additives. With milk, we often recommend further processing. Cheese and butter are the most suitable because the radionuclides concentrate in the whey and buttermilk. This is how the face of agriculture has changed in the 30 years since Chernobyl. But at least it still exists outside the restricted areas. This also holds true for the many small farmer who, often as a side job, have their own vegetable garden. They are able to analyse their soils just like the large kolkhozes, and we advise them on which vegetables are recommended for them. We also have different brochures for mushroom and berry pickers, as well as for hunters. There are also maps that show the soil contamination with high accuracy.
The fact that many people in Belarus avoid products from the Gomel region cannot be argued away nor can we deny that there's a problem with selling those goods. And I can understand this to some extent. On the other hand, the state institutions are doing all they can to ensure that the only food to make it onto the market is that which complies with the limits, which incidentally are in many cases far more stringent than those in the European Union or Russia. We strictly control the food independent of any such instructions. But the problem doesn't only have to do with contamination. It's about trust. This is what various surveys that we've conducted show. The rejection is seen at all levels, but the better educated people tend to also be the most sceptical. Their lack of confidence is justified, and it's up to us to do something so we can earn this trust."

Read more:

What other choise do we have?

Who we are

Founded in 2012, the Association for Sustainable Journalism on the Internet is committed to high-quality, independent on-line journalism that stands the test of time. The association promotes and runs journalistic websites dedicated to topics that are hardly covered any more in conventional media. Its members include journalists, photographers, designers and web designers.

Pressbüro Seegrund, which was founded in 1989, is firmly established in the media landscape. Its focus is on feature reports, reportage and non-fiction books. It has launched a number of online magazines in recent years including and the latest creation


Association for Sustainable Journalism in Internet
Neugasse 30
CH-9000 St. Gallen

Pressebüro Seegrund,
Neugasse 30, PO Box 445,
CH-9004 St. Gallen,
Tel. +41(0)71 671 10 73,

letters to the editor:

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

We would like to thank Susanne and Stefan Ganzoni for their financial support

Website design and programming:
Eveline Arnold Ukaegbu, Proclamation,
Zypressenstrasse 138,
CH-8004 Zürich,

English translation:
Elana Summers

Russian translation:
Alexej Scherbakov

Local interpretors:

Galina Kovalch (Belarus),
Irina Gasanova (Ukraine), Chikako Yamamoto (Japan)

Martin Arnold, freelance journalist, author and media entrepreneur for the past 30 years, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Urs Fitze, freelance journalist, reportage on politics, the economy, science, travel and the environment, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.



Our Aim

Without provoking or causing a scandal, wants to shake things up a bit by encouraging society to reflect on a subject that affects all of us: nuclear power. It is a subject that polarises, turning opponents and supporters into ideologues. And it is a subject that divides the informed and the uninformed in a way that creates intentional and unintentional dependencies. Against the background of the current debates on the 'energy transition', we want to contribute a critical discussion for all those who want to more know about nuclear power. And we want to do our bit to overcome the deep ideological divide that separates supporters and opponents. When it comes to this subject, the truth very quickly becomes relative – or is made relative. You move around in an area where experts, opinion makers, ideologues, affected persons, victims, lobbyists, politicians and world saviours jostle against each other. Everyone should be able to have their say, to tell their truth. The truth of the radiation victims as well as that of the power plant operators, the supporters and the opponents. The second objective of the book is to explore the many facets of truth – and remain receptive to all those who want to make it comfortable for us.


Newsletter Signup